Resultados del trasplante renal con donante vivo: análisis comparativo entre arteria renal única y múltiple / Outcome in Living Donor Kidney Transplant: Comparative Análisis of Single and Multiple Renal Arteries

Objetivos: Realizar un análisis comparativo de los resultados funcionales y complicaciones en trasplantados renales y sus respectivos donantes vivos con arteria renal única versus múltiple. Materiales y métodos: Trabajo retrospectivo analítico de una base de datos confeccionada prospectivamente de pacientes sometidos a trasplantes renales con donante vivo en nuestra institución entre mayo de 2010 y julio de 2014. Según el número de arterias presentes en la angiotomografía preoperatoria se confeccionaron dos grupos: grupo 1 (arteria renal única) y grupo 2 (arteria renal múltiple). Resultados: De los 91 pacientes incluidos, el 37% (n=34) presentaba arterias renales múltiples. Se realizó una nefrectomía laparoscópica al 63% (n=36) y el 41% (n=14) de los donantes del grupo 1 y el grupo 2, respectivamente (p=0,05). Tiempos promedio de isquemia total (grupo 1: 55,6 min; grupo 2: 56 min; p=0,931), de anastomosis (grupo 1: 29,6 min; grupo 2: 29,7 min; p=0,982) y de "cirugía de banco" (grupo 1: 23,5 min; grupo 2: 23,8 min; p=0,948). Transfusión de glóbulos rojos en los receptores (grupo 1: 7%; grupo 2: 14%; p=0,23). Porcentaje de hemodiálisis en la primera semana (grupo 1: 5,2%; grupo 2: 5,8%; p=1). No se hallaron diferencias significativas entre grupos a nivel de tasa de complicaciones y días de internación. Ambos grupos presentaron una sobrevida del injerto del 100% a los 35,6 meses de seguimiento promedio. Conclusiones: La presencia de multiplicidad arterial no debe ser considerada una contraindicación para el donante vivo, ya que el implante de estos injertos logra resultados funcionales similares a los injertos renales con arteria única, sin aumentar la morbilidad del procedimiento. (AU)

Objectives: TTo compare functional outcomes and complications in patients with a single artery versus multiple arteries undergoing living donor nephrectomy. Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospective collected database of living donor kidney transplantations performed at our institution between May 2010 and July 2014. According to the number of arteries present in preoperative angiotomography, two groups of patients were organized: group 1 (single artery) and group 2 (multiple arteries). Results: TNinety-one living donor kidney transplantations were performed during this period. A total of 34 patients (37%) had multiple renal arteries. Mean total ischemia time (single: 55.6 min; multiple: 56 min; p=0.931), anastomosis time (single: 29.6 min; multiple: 29.7 min; p=0.982), bench surgery time (single: 23.5 min; multiple: 23.8 min; p=0.948). Blood transfusion rate was 7% and 14% for group 1 and group 2, respectively (p=0.23). Three patients in group 1 (5.2%) and two patients in group 2 (5.8%) needed dialysis during the first postoperative week (p=1). Overall, recipient complication rate and hospital stay were similar between group 1 and 2. Both groups had a 100% graft survival with a mean follow-up of 35.6 months. Conclusions: The presence of multiple renal arteries should not be considered a contraindication for the living donor nephrectomy, since these grafts achieve similar functional results to single artery renal grafts, without increasing the morbidity of the procedure. (AU)

Functional and oncologic outcomes after nephron-sparing surgery in a solitary kidney: 10 years of experience

ABSTRACT Objectives: To evaluate functional and oncologic outcomes of partial nephrectomy (PN) in patients with a solitary kidney. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with a solitary kidney undergoing nephron-sparing surgery between March 2003 and March 2013 was performed. GFR was recorded before the procedure and 3 months after surgery, thus establishing a change (cGFR). Several variables that may influence cGFR were analyzed. Complications are herein described, namely bleeding, fistula, acute renal failure and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Local recurrence and margin status are also described. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan Meier method (2 patients with metastasis at the time of surgery were excluded from the analysis). Results: Forty-five patients were available for analysis. Median follow-up was 27.56 months (r 3-96). Mean cGFR was-7.12mL/min (SD 2.1). Variables significantly related with lower GFR after surgery were loss of renal mass (p=0.01)) and male gender (p=0.03). Four patients (8.8%) experienced hemorrhage. Nine patients (20%) developed a urinary fistula. Only one patient with bleeding required open surgery. Two patients (4.4%) needed transient dialysis. Three patients (6.6%) developed ESRD. Four patients (8.8%) had positive surgical margins (PSMs) and four patients (88%) had local recurrence (2 of these had PSMs). Five patients (11.1%) died during follow-up. Four patients (8.8%) died because of renal cancer. Estimated 2-year overall survival, disease-free survival and cancer specific survival rates were 88.4% (CI 95% 70.5-96); 87.7% (CI 95% 68.1-96) and 92.4% (CI 95% 75-98), respectively. Conclusion: Loss of renal mass and male gender were associated with lower postoperative GFR. Our outcomes were comparable with those in the World literature.